So it can be difficult to notice that changes have been made and even more difficult to determine if changes were made to the correct version of the file! Limited Font Selectionįor the same reason, font selection in PowerPoint is limited to universal system fonts. But in PowerPoint, authors are often making changes to native files. So only one person ever touches the master design file and therefore, version control is a non issue.
Reviewers annotate their revisions, which are then sent to a designer to implement. InDesign files are reviewed in pdf format. This can be due to the nature of the review process. We see a larger percentage of version control issues in scientific posters that are laid out in PowerPoint. It also increases the margin for error, which can lead to additional unnecessary rounds, more proofreading and more time. So each round of revisions take longer to accomplish. Since text boxes don’t link up in PowerPoint the way they do in InDesign, text needs to be reflowed manually. Scientific posters often undergo many rounds of revision. To get the best results when laying out your scientific posters, here are a few reasons why you’re better off using a layout program like InDesign. But PowerPoint slides are meant to be projected on screen, not printed on a piece of fabric or laminated paper. When it comes to content development, PowerPoint is versatile and easy to use.
We understand the lure of using PowerPoint for scientific poster layout.
0 kommentar(er)
